|
|
|
PDF
|
|
Type:
|
Conference Paper |
|
Author:
|
López, Maria Claudia |
|
Conference:
|
Governing Shared Resources: Connecting Local Experience to Global Challenges, the Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commons |
|
Location:
|
Cheltenham, England |
|
Conf. Date:
|
July 14-18, 2008 |
|
Date:
|
2008 |
|
URI:
|
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/812
|
|
Sector:
|
General & Multiple Resources |
|
Region:
|
South America |
|
Subject(s):
|
conservation
rural affairs
community participation
participatory development
|
|
Abstract:
|
"In this paper I argue that by conducting economic experiments combined with qualitative methods in rural areas, it is possible not only to gather valuable information about institutional arrangements that might be effective in protecting the commons; but it is also an effective way to empower communities for the conservation of their natural resources. This presentation is the result of a series of field experiments, rural appraisal tools, surveys, and discussions conducted in rural Colombia with direct users of natural resources. In addition to interviews held latter in time with users participating in those activities and policy makers working directly with these communities.
"The first part of the presentation describes the methodologies used in the field. In detail I explain the advantages of using experimental economics in the field without losing the internal validity of the experiments conducted in the laboratory. Then, an overview of the other methodologies is provided, in particular: participatory rural appraisal tools. This qualitative analytical tool allows researchers to understand the dynamics of the community and the natural resources that they use to sustain their livelihood. The combination of methodologies allows the research team and the community members to create bridges between what happen in the economic experiment and what happen in their daily life as users of natural resources. Finally, I introduce the results of a set of interviews conducted at a later time, not only with participants of the experiments but also with policy makers involved in designing regulations."
|