Influence of non-osteoporotic treatments in patients on active anti-osteoporotic therapy: evidence from the OSTEOMED registry
Ver/ Abrir
Registro completo
Mostrar el registro completo DCAutoría
Coco-Martín, María; Leal-Vega, Luis; Blázquez-Cabrera, José Antonio; Navarro, Amalia; Moro, María Jesús; Arranz-García, Francisca; Amérigo, María José; Sosa-Henríquez, Manuel; Vázquez, María Ángeles; Montoya, María José; Díaz-Curiel, Manuel; Olmos Martínez, José Manuel; Ruiz-Mambrilla, Marta; Filgueira-Rubio, José; Pérez-Castrillón, José Luis; OSTEOMED GroupFecha
2023Derechos
Attribution 4.0 International
Publicado en
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2023, 79, 1333-1339
Editorial
Springer
Enlace a la publicación
Palabras clave
Osteoporosis
Fractures
Prescription drugs
Cohort analysis
Logistic models
Resumen/Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of different non-osteoporotic drugs on the increase or decrease in the risk of incident fragility fractures (vertebral, humerus or hip) in a cohort of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis on active anti-osteoporotic therapy.
Methods
For this retrospective longitudinal study, baseline and follow-up data on prescribed non-osteoporotic treatments and the occurrence of vertebral, humerus or hip fractures in 993 patients from the OSTEOMED registry were analyzed using logistic regression models. The drugs evaluated with a possible beneficial effect were thiazides and statins, while the drugs evaluated with a possible harmful effect were antiandrogens, aromatase inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, GnRH agonists, thyroid hormones, and oral and inhaled corticosteroids.
Results
Logistic regression analyses indicated that no treatment significantly improved fracture risk, with the only treatments that significantly worsened fracture risk being letrozole (OR = 0.18, p-value = 0.03) and oral corticosteroids at doses <_5 mg/day (OR = 0.16, p-value = 0.03) and >5 mg/day (OR = 0.27, p-value = 0.04).
Conclusion
The potential beneficial or detrimental effects of the different drugs evaluated on fracture risk are masked by treatment with anabolic or antiresorptive drugs that have a more potent action on bone metabolism, with two exceptions: letrozole and oral corticosteroids. These findings may have important clinical implications, as patients receiving these treatments are not fully protected by bisphosphonates, which may imply the need for more potent anti-osteoporotic drugs such as denosumab or teriparatide
Colecciones a las que pertenece
- D22 Artículos [895]
Items relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por título, autor, creador y tema.
-
Use of tocilizumab in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-1
Pérez Sáez, María J; Blasco, Miquel; Redondo Pachón, Dolores; Ventura Aguiar, Pedro; Bada Bosch, Teresa; Pérez Florez, Isabel; Melilli, Edoardo; Sánchez Cámara, Luis A; López Oliva, María O; Canal, Cristina; Shabaka, Amir; Garra Moncau, Nuria; Martín Moreno, Paloma L; López, Verónica; Hernández Gallego, Román; Siverio, Orlando; Galeano, Cristina; Espí Reig, Jordi; Cabezas, Carlos J; [et al.] (Wiley Periodicals Inc., 2020) -
Role of targeted therapies in rheumatic patients on COVID-19 outcomes: results from the COVIDSER study
Álvaro Gracia, Jose María; Sanchez-Piedra, Carlos; Manero, Javier; Ruiz-Lucea, María Ester; López-Vives, Laura; Bohorquez, Cristina; Martinez-Barrio, Julia; Bonilla, Gema; Vela, Paloma; García-Villanueva, María Jesús; Navío-Marco, María Teresa; Pavía, Marina; Galindo, María; Erausquin, Celia; González-Gay Mantecón, Miguel Ángel; Rua-Figueroa, Inigo; Pego-Reigosa, Jose M.; Castrejon, Isabel; Sanchez-Costa, Jesús T.; [et al.] (BMJ Publishing Group, 2021)