Data underlying (The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses)
2022-09-08T19:35:35Z
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsKeywords
Collection period
2021-11-01
2022-04-30
2022-04-30
Date completed
Date updated
Time period coverage
Geographic coverage
Source information
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Data underlying (The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses)
Published Date
2022-09-08T19:35:35Z
Author Contact
Theis-Mahon, Nicole
theis025@umn.edu
theis025@umn.edu
Type
Dataset
Abstract
Data consists of two csv files for a set of 310 systematic reviews/evidence syntheses (methods of identification outlined in Brown et al.) Methodological quality of the systematic review/evidence synthesis was assessed using AMSTAR 2 criteria. Citation meaning was assessed using previous mapping of the Retraction Watch Database’s reason for retraction to a modified version of Bar Ilan and Halevi’s taxonomy of reasons for retraction. Image attribution: The image for this record is by Mohamed Mb and can be found on The Noun Project at https://thenounproject.com/icon/error-1678343/.
Description
Funding Information
Referenced by
Related to
Replaces
Publisher
Collections
Funding information
Previously Published Citation
Suggested citation
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.