日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons19783

Koch,  Iring
Department Psychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19925

Philipp,  Andrea Mona
Department Psychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons19649

Gade,  Miriam
Department Psychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

koch_chunking.pdf
(全文テキスト(全般)), 85KB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Koch, I., Philipp, A. M., & Gade, M. (2006). Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science, 17(4), 346-350. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01709.x.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0010-A3ED-3
要旨
In a study of the formation of representations of task sequences and its influence on task inhibition, participants first performed tasks in a predictable sequence (e.g., ABACBC) and then performed the tasks in a random sequence. Half of the participants were explicitly instructed about the predictable sequence, whereas the other participants did not receive these instructions. Task-sequence learning was inferred from shorter reaction times (RTs) in predictable relative to random sequences. Persisting inhibition of competing tasks was indicated by increased RTs in n- 2 task repetitions (e.g., ABA) compared with n- 2 nonrepetitions (e.g., CBA). The results show task-sequence learning for both groups. However, task inhibition was reduced in predictable relative to random sequences among instructed-learning participants who formed an explicit representation of the task sequence, whereas sequence learning and task inhibition were independent in the noninstructed group. We hypothesize that the explicit instructions led to chunking of the task sequence, and that n- 2 repetitions served as chunk points (ABA-CBC), so that within-chunk facilitation modulated the inhibition effect.