English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Heteroepitaxial Growth and Nucleation of Iron Oxide Films on Ru(0001)

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons21710

Ketteler,  Guido
Inorganic Chemistry, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons21990

Ranke,  Wolfgang
Inorganic Chemistry, Fritz Haber Institute, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ketteler, G., & Ranke, W. (2003). Heteroepitaxial Growth and Nucleation of Iron Oxide Films on Ru(0001). Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 107(18), 4320-4333. doi:10.1021/jp027265f.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0011-11BE-5
Abstract
Heteroepitaxial growth of thin iron oxide films on Ru(0001) is investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and low-energy electron diffraction (LEED). Metastable FeO(111) layers grow with a thickness up to 4 monolayers (ML) on Ru(0001) by oxidation of the corresponding amount Fe in 10-6 mbar O2 at 870 K with a final anneal to 1000K. Prolonged oxidation transforms the whole film to the thermodynamically more stable Fe3O4(111) phase. This phase transition requires at least two bulk repeat units of Fe3O4(111) and does therefore not occur in very thin FeO(111) films. Oxidation of 1-3 ML thick FeO(111) films lead to a heterogeneous nucleation of Fe3O4(111) islands, preferentially at step edges where due to iron oxide diffusion the required thickness can locally be established. Homogeneous nucleation of self-assembled, periodic Fe3O4(111) nanodomains embedded in an ultrathin FeO(111) occurs in ~4 ML thick FeO(111) films. The driving force is an electrostatic and thermodynamic energy gain. The results are compared to the Stranski-Krastanov growth of iron oxides on Pt(111) [W. Weiss, M. Ritter, Phys. Rev. B59 (1999), 5201]. Differences in the growth behavior of iron oxides on Ru(0001) and Pt(111) are discussed in terms of the different affin-ity of the iron oxide film toward both metals, showing that the stabilization mechanism and growth mode for the same metal oxide phases de-pends strongly on the substrate