An artificial opposition between grammaticality and frequency: Comment on 
Bornkessel, Schlesewsky & Friederici (2002)

Kempen, Gerard; Harbusch, Karin

doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00145-8

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Please note that a newer version of this item is available:
https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/item/item_58415_2

DetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

An artificial opposition between grammaticality and frequency: Comment on Bornkessel, Schlesewsky & Friederici (2002)

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons91

Kempen, Gerard
Other Research, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

restricted access to full text (institute-wide)
(Supplementary material)

restricted access to full text (selected user)
(Supplementary material)

restricted access to full text (institute-wide)
(Supplementary material)

restricted access to full text (selected user)
(Supplementary material)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

Kempen_2003_artificial.pdf
(Publisher version), 72KB

Kempen_2003_rectification.pdf
(Publisher version), 36KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Kempen, G., & Harbusch, K. (2003). An artificial opposition between grammaticality and frequency: Comment on Bornkessel, Schlesewsky & Friederici (2002). Cognition, 90(2), 205-210 [Rectification on p. 215]. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00145-8.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-191A-E

Abstract

In a recent Cognition paper (Cognition 85 (2002) B21), Bornkessel, Schlesewsky, and Friederici report ERP data that they claim “show that online processing difficulties induced by word order variations in German cannot be attributed to the relative infrequency of the constructions in question, but rather appear to reflect the application of grammatical principles during parsing” (p. B21). In this commentary we demonstrate that the posited contrast between grammatical principles and construction (in)frequency as sources of parsing problems is artificial because it is based on factually incorrect assumptions about the grammar of German and on inaccurate corpus frequency data concerning the German constructions involved.