日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Phenotypic Association Analyses With Copy Number Variation in Recurrent Depressive Disorder

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons80372

Holsboer,  Florian
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
There are no locators available
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Rucker, J. J. H., Tansey, K. E., Rivera, M., Pinto, D., Cohen-Woods, S., Uher, R., Aitchison, K. J., Craddock, N., Owen, M. J., Jones, L., Jones, I., Korszun, A., Barnes, M. R., Preisig, M., Mors, O., Maier, W., Rice, J., Rietschel, M., Holsboer, F., Farmer, A. E., Craig, I. W., Scherer, S. W., McGuffin, P., & Breen, G. (2016). Phenotypic Association Analyses With Copy Number Variation in Recurrent Depressive Disorder. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 79(4), 329-336. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.025.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-A74C-2
要旨
BACKGROUND: Defining the molecular genomic basis of the likelihood of developing depressive disorder is a considerable challenge. We previously associated rare, exonic deletion copy number variants (CNV) with recurrent depressive disorder (RDD). Sex chromosome abnormalities also have been observed to co-occur with RDD. METHODS: In this reanalysis of our RDD dataset (N = 3106 cases; 459 screened control samples and 2699 population control samples), we further investigated the role of larger CNVs and chromosomal abnormalities in RDD and performed association analyses with clinical data derived from this dataset. RESULTS: We found an enrichment of Turner's syndrome among cases of depression compared with the frequency observed in a large population sample (N = 34,910) of live-born infants collected in Denmark (two-sided p =.023, odds ratio = 7.76 [95% confidence interval = 1.79-33.6]), a case of diploid/triploid mosaicism, and several cases of uniparental isodisomy. In contrast to our previous analysis, large deletion CNVs were no more frequent in cases than control samples, although deletion CNVs in cases contained more genes than control samples (two-sided p =.0002). CONCLUSIONS: After statistical correction for multiple comparisons, our data do not support a substantial role for CNVs in RDD, although (as has been observed in similar samples) occasional cases may harbor large variants with etiological significance. Genetic pleiotropy and sample heterogeneity suggest that very large sample sizes are required to study conclusively the role of genetic variation in mood disorders.