Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/86724

TítuloEnd-user assessment of an innovative clothing-based sensor developed for pressure injury prevention: a mixed-method study
Autor(es)Rêgo, Anderson S.
Filipe, Luísa
Dias, Rosana A.
Alves, Filipe S.
Queiroz, José
Ainla, Alar
Arruda, Luísa M.
Fangueiro, Raúl
Bouçanova, Maria
Bernardes, Rafael A.
de Sousa, Liliana B.
Santos-Costa, Paulo
Apóstolo, João A.
Parreira, Pedro
Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela
Palavras-chaveBiomedical technology assessment
Wearable electronic devices
Protective clothing
Pressure injury
Mobility limitation
Bedridden persons
Data24-Fev-2023
EditoraMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
RevistaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
CitaçãoRêgo, A.S.; Filipe, L.; Dias, R.A.; Alves, F.S.; Queiroz, J.; Ainla, A.; Arruda, L.M.; Fangueiro, R.; Bouçanova, M.; Bernardes, R.A.; et al. End-User Assessment of an Innovative Clothing-Based Sensor Developed for Pressure Injury Prevention: A Mixed-Method Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 4039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054039
Resumo(s)This study aimed to evaluate a clothing prototype that incorporates sensors for the evaluation of pressure, temperature, and humidity for the prevention of pressure injuries, namely regarding physical and comfort requirements. A mixed-method approach was used with concurrent quantitative and qualitative data triangulation. A structured questionnaire was applied before a focus group of experts to evaluate the sensor prototypes. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics and the discourse of the collective subject, followed by method integration and meta-inferences. Nine nurses, experts in this topic, aged 32.66 ± 6.28 years and with a time of profession of 10.88 ± 6.19 years, participated in the study. Prototype A presented low evaluation in stiffness (1.56 ± 1.01) and roughness (2.11 ± 1.17). Prototype B showed smaller values in dimension (2.77 ± 0.83) and stiffness (3.00 ± 1.22). Embroidery was assessed as inadequate in terms of stiffness (1.88 ± 1.05) and roughness (2.44 ± 1.01). The results from the questionnaires and focus groups’ show low adequacy as to stiffness, roughness, and comfort. The participants highlighted the need for improvements regarding stiffness and comfort, suggesting new proposals for the development of sensors for clothing. The main conclusions are that Prototype A presented the lowest average scores relative to rigidity (1.56 ± 1.01), considered inadequate. This dimension of Prototype B was evaluated as slightly adequate (2.77 ± 0.83). The rigidity (1.88 ± 1.05) of Prototype A + B + embroidery was evaluated as inadequate. The prototype revealed clothing sensors with low adequacy regarding the physical requirements, such as stiffness or roughness. Improvements are needed regarding the stiffness and roughness for the safety and comfort characteristics of the device evaluated.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/86724
DOI10.3390/ijerph20054039
ISSN1661-7827
e-ISSN1660-4601
Versão da editorahttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4039
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:BUM - MDPI

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ijerph-20-04039.pdf1,49 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID