Article (Scientific journals)
A Randomized Trial of Enteral Glutamine for Treatment of Burn Injuries.
Heyland, Daren K; Wibbenmeyer, Lucy; Pollack, Jonathan A et al.
2022In New England Journal of Medicine, 387 (11), p. 1001-1010
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Re-Energize (NEJM 22) .pdf
Author postprint (544.56 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Glutamine; Canada; Critical Illness; Enteral Nutrition; Humans; Burns/drug therapy; Glutamine/adverse effects; General Medicine
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: Glutamine is thought to have beneficial effects on the metabolic and stress response to severe injury. Clinical trials involving patients with burns and other critically ill patients have shown conflicting results regarding the benefits and risks of glutamine supplementation. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with deep second- or third-degree burns (affecting ≥10% to ≥20% of total body-surface area, depending on age) within 72 hours after hospital admission to receive 0.5 g per kilogram of body weight per day of enterally delivered glutamine or placebo. Trial agents were given every 4 hours through a feeding tube or three or four times a day by mouth until 7 days after the last skin grafting procedure, discharge from the acute care unit, or 3 months after admission, whichever came first. The primary outcome was the time to discharge alive from the hospital, with data censored at 90 days. We calculated subdistribution hazard ratios for discharge alive, which took into account death as a competing risk. RESULTS: A total of 1209 patients with severe burns (mean burn size, 33% of total body-surface area) underwent randomization, and 1200 were included in the analysis (596 patients in the glutamine group and 604 in the placebo group). The median time to discharge alive from the hospital was 40 days (interquartile range, 24 to 87) in the glutamine group and 38 days (interquartile range, 22 to 75) in the placebo group (subdistribution hazard ratio for discharge alive, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.04; P = 0.17). Mortality at 6 months was 17.2% in the glutamine group and 16.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.41). No substantial between-group differences in serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe burns, supplemental glutamine did not reduce the time to discharge alive from the hospital. (Funded by the U.S. Department of Defense and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; RE-ENERGIZE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00985205.).
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Heyland, Daren K
Wibbenmeyer, Lucy
Pollack, Jonathan A
Friedman, Bruce
Turgeon, Alexis F
Eshraghi, Niknam
Jeschke, Marc G
Béliste, Sylvain
Grau, Daisy
Mandell, Samuel
Velamuri, Sai R
Hundeshagen, Gabriel
Moiemen, Naiem
Shokrollahi, Kayvan
Foster, Kevin
Huss, Fredrik
Collins, Declan
Savetamal, Alisa
Gurney, Jennifer M
Depetris, Nadia
Stoppe, Christian
Ortiz-Reyes, Luis
Garrel, Dominique
Day, Andrew G
RE-ENERGIZE Trial Team
More authors (15 more) Less
Other collaborator :
Rousseau, Anne-Françoise  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des soins intensifs
Language :
English
Title :
A Randomized Trial of Enteral Glutamine for Treatment of Burn Injuries.
Publication date :
2022
Journal title :
New England Journal of Medicine
ISSN :
0028-4793
eISSN :
1533-4406
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, United States
Volume :
387
Issue :
11
Pages :
1001-1010
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
USDOD - United States Department of Defense [US-DC] [US-DC]
CIHR - Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CA]
Available on ORBi :
since 26 September 2022

Statistics


Number of views
32 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
24
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
18
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi