Appraisal; Evaluation; Illocutionary force; Pragmatics; Speech act theory; Valuative speech act; Value ascription; Language and Linguistics; Philosophy; Linguistics and Language
Abstract :
[en] This paper presents an account of value ascription as an illocutionary force, based on four claims: (1) that value ascription is a kind of illocutionary force, defining a specific kind of speech act, i.e. valuative speech acts (VSAs); (2) that the point of VSAs is ascribing an axiological value to a referent; (3) that VSAs create a weak, inside-oriented truth commitment; and (4) that they are therefore more about the valuating subject than they are about the valuated object. This illocutionary force is described using criteria taken from contemporary speech act theory as well as others that have proven informative. This description results in a rich taxonomy of VSAs. This shows the viability and fruitfulness of a pragmatic account of value ascription, and it contributes to the development of speech act theory, specifically with regard to the distinction between primary and secondary illocutionary points, and the speech act taxonomy itself.
Disciplines :
Languages & linguistics
Author, co-author :
Wong García, Ernesto ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de langues modernes : linguistique, littérature et traduction > Traduction du français vers l'espagnol
Language :
English
Title :
Toward a pragmatic account and taxonomy of valuative speech acts
Publication date :
07 March 2019
Journal title :
Pragmatics
ISSN :
1018-2101
eISSN :
2406-4238
Publisher :
John Benjamins Publishing Company, ME Amsterdam, Nld
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Caballero Díaz, Leandro. 2014. Semántica y diccionario. Havana: Ciencias Sociales.
Colbert, S., J. Stewart, C. Licht, T. Purcell, M. Bennet, and B. Julien, prods. 2018. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. New York: CBS, January 24, 2018.
Coley, John D., Patrick Shafto, Olga Stepanova, and Elizabeth Baraff. 2005. “Knowledge and Category-Based Induction.” In Categorization Inside and Outside the Laboratory: Essays in Honor of Douglas L. Medin, ed. by W. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, and P. Wolff, 69–86. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11156‑005
Dafoe, Willem. 2018. Interview by Stephen Colbert. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, CBS, January 24, 2018.
Gaffigan, Jim. 2018. Interview by Seth Meyers. Late Night with Seth Meyers, NBC, January 24, 2018.
Galbán Pozo, Ana María. 1999. “Análisis dimensional de verbos con semántica valorativa en lengua alemana.” Masters thesis, University of Havana.
Galbán Pozo, Ana María. 2003. “Aproximación al estudio de las macro-categorías semánticas modales (valoración, lealtad, certidumbre, interés, afectividad y expresividad) y su expresión a través de verbos de las lenguas española y alemana.” PhD diss., University of Havana.
González de Prado Salas, Javier, and Iván Milić. 2018. “Recommending Beauty: Semantics and Pragmatics of Aesthetic Predicates.” Inquiry 61 (2): 198–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2016.1238778
Green, Mitchell. 2017. “Speech Acts.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/speech-acts/
Greimas, Algirdas J. 1966. Sémantique Structurale. Paris: Larousse.
Hampton, James A., and Iben Cannon. 2004. “Category-based Induction: An Effect of Conclusion Typicality.” Memory & Cognition 32 (2): 235–243. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196855
Jones, Van. 2018. Interview by Seth Meyers. Late Night with Seth Meyers, NBC, January 24, 2018.
Kennedy, Christopher, and Louise McNally. 2005. “Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates.” Language 81 (2): 345–381. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071
Kölbel, M. 2003. “Faultless Disagreement.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467‑9264.t01‑1‑00003
Kudrow, Lisa, and Martin Short. 2018. Interview by James Corden. The Late Late Show with James Corden, CBS, January 31, 2018.
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
McGowan, Rose. 2018. Interview by Stephen Colbert. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, CBS, January 31, 2018.
Mirren, Helen. 2018. Interview by Graham Norton. The Graham Norton Show, BBC Two, January 26, 2018.
Moeschler, Jacques. 2004. “Dialogue et Causalité: Force Causale, Actes de Langage et Enchaînement.” Cahiers de Linguistique Française 26: 67–85.
Oishi, Etsuko. 2006. “Austin’s Speech Act Theory and the Speech Situation.” Esercizi Filosofici 1: 1–14.
Oteíza, Teresa. 2017. “The Appraisal Framework and Discourse Analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ed. by T. Bartlett, and G. O’Grady, 457–472. London: Routledge.
Sbisà, Marina. 2014. “The Austinian Conception of Illocution and its Implications for Value Judgments and Social Ontology.” Etica & Politica/Ethics & Politics 16 (2): 619–631.
Searle, John R. 1975. “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Language, Mind, and Knowledge, ed. by K. Gunderson, 344–369. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
Searle, John R. 2002. “Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality”. In Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality: Discussions with John R. Searle, ed. by G. Grewendorf, and G. Meggle, 3–16. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0589‑0_1
Searle, John R. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siebel, Mark. 2002. “What Is an Illocutionary Point?” In Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality: Discussions with John R. Searle, ed. by G. Grewendorf, and G. Meggle, 125–139. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0589‑0_9
Solt, Stephanie. 2015. “Measurement Scales in Natural Language.” Language and Linguistics Compass 9 (1): 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12101
Ulkan, M. 1992. Zur Klassification von Sprechakten. Tübigen. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111352619
Yamauchi, Takashi, and Arthur B. Markman. 2000. “Inference Using Categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (3): 776–795.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.