Article (Scientific journals)
Toward a pragmatic account and taxonomy of valuative speech acts
Wong García, Ernesto
2019In Pragmatics, 29 (1), p. 107 - 131
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
prag.17045.won[1].pdf
Publisher postprint (567.31 kB) Creative Commons License - Attribution, Non-Commercial
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Appraisal; Evaluation; Illocutionary force; Pragmatics; Speech act theory; Valuative speech act; Value ascription; Language and Linguistics; Philosophy; Linguistics and Language
Abstract :
[en] This paper presents an account of value ascription as an illocutionary force, based on four claims: (1) that value ascription is a kind of illocutionary force, defining a specific kind of speech act, i.e. valuative speech acts (VSAs); (2) that the point of VSAs is ascribing an axiological value to a referent; (3) that VSAs create a weak, inside-oriented truth commitment; and (4) that they are therefore more about the valuating subject than they are about the valuated object. This illocutionary force is described using criteria taken from contemporary speech act theory as well as others that have proven informative. This description results in a rich taxonomy of VSAs. This shows the viability and fruitfulness of a pragmatic account of value ascription, and it contributes to the development of speech act theory, specifically with regard to the distinction between primary and secondary illocutionary points, and the speech act taxonomy itself.
Disciplines :
Languages & linguistics
Author, co-author :
Wong García, Ernesto  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de langues modernes : linguistique, littérature et traduction > Traduction du français vers l'espagnol
Language :
English
Title :
Toward a pragmatic account and taxonomy of valuative speech acts
Publication date :
07 March 2019
Journal title :
Pragmatics
ISSN :
1018-2101
eISSN :
2406-4238
Publisher :
John Benjamins Publishing Company, ME Amsterdam, Nld
Volume :
29
Issue :
1
Pages :
107 - 131
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 08 January 2024

Statistics


Number of views
7 (1 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
13 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
3
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
3
OpenAlex citations
 
0

publications
0
supporting
0
mentioning
0
contrasting
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi