Multimodality imaging for the diagnosis and assessment of aortic stenosis  severity.

Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging/physiopathology; Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis/physiopathology; Disease Management; Echocardiography/methods; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine/methods; Multimodal Imaging/methods; Severity of Illness Index; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods; Aortic stenosis; cardiac resonance imaging; computed tomography; echocardiography; guidelines; imaging; nuclear cardiology

Abstract :

[en] INTRODUCTION: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common cause of valvular heart disease. Imaging plays a major role in the diagnosis and evaluation of AS severity. AREAS COVERED: The present review focuses on new emerging concepts in AS by stressing the substantial value of imaging into the understanding of the complex pathophysiology and management of AS. Expert commentary: Though, standard 2D echocardiography is often diagnostic multi-modality imaging can be required in patients with doubtful results or to refine the evaluation of AS.

Disciplines :

Cardiovascular & respiratory systems

Author, co-author :

Davin, Laurent ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de cardiologie

Dulgheru, Raluca Elena ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de cardiologie

Bernard, Anne; b Cardiology Department , CHU Tours, France et Université de Tours , Tours , France.

Marchetta, Stella; a GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences, Departments of Cardiology, Heart Valve Clinic, CHU Sart Tilman , University of Liège Hospital , Liège , Belgium.

Piérard, Luc A; a GIGA Cardiovascular Sciences, Departments of Cardiology, Heart Valve Clinic, CHU Sart Tilman , University of Liège Hospital , Liège , Belgium.

Lancellotti, Patrizio ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de cardiologie ; c Gruppo Villa Maria Care and Research , Anthea Hospital , Bari , Italy.

Language :

English

Title :

Multimodality imaging for the diagnosis and assessment of aortic stenosis severity.

Publication date :

October 2016

Journal title :

Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy

ISSN :

1477-9072

eISSN :

1744-8344

Publisher :

Taylor & Francis, Gb

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

1177-88

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 22 January 2024

Statistics

Number of views

1 (0 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

1 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

A.Vahanian, O.Alfieri, F.Andreotti, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2451–2496.
H.Baumgartner, J.Hung, J.Bermejo, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis:EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10(1):1–25.
R.A.Nishimura, C.M.Otto, R.O.Bonow, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease:executive summary:a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2438–2488.
C.R.deFilippi, D.L.Willett, E.Brickner, et al. Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:191–194.
M.A.Clavel, P.V.Ennezat, S.Marechaux, et al. Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:175–183.
J.Minners, M.Allgeier, C.Gohlke-Baerwolf, et al. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1043–1048.
J.G.Dumesnil, P.Pibarot, B.Carabello Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction:implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:281–289.
P.Lancellotti, J.Magne, E.Donal, et al. Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis:insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:235–243.•• This is the first study that used the new AS classification based on flow- gradient patterns providing outcome information for each AS category.
H.C.Herrmann, P.Pibarot, I.Hueter, et al. Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis:a placement of aortic Transcatheter valves (PARTNER) trial analysis. Circulation. 2013;127:2316–2326.
M.F.Eleid, P.Sorajja, H.I.Michelena, et al. Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction:clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation. 2013;128:1781–1789.
Z.Hachicha, J.G.Dumesnil, P.Bogaty, et al. Paradoxical low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation. 2007;115:2856–2864.• This is the first study that described and characterized LF/LG AS with preserved LVEF, namely “paradoxical LF/LG AS.
J.L.Monin, P.Lancellotti, M.Monchi, et al. Risk score for predicting outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:69–75.
J.Adda, C.Mielot, R.Giorgi, et al. Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography:a multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:27–35.
G.Melis, G.Frontera, G.Caldentey, et al. Systolic volume index by Doppler echocardiography is an useful marker for stratification and prognostic evaluation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013;66:261–268.
P.Lancellotti, E.Donal, J.Magne, et al. Impact of global left ventricular afterload on left ventricular function in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis:a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:537–543.
S.Herrmann, S.Stork, M.Niemann, et al. Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:402–412.
J.S.Dahl, M.F.Eleid, S.V.Pislaru, et al. Development of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2015;101:1015–1023.
H.M.Connolly, J.K.Oh, H.V.Schaff, et al. Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction. Result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients. Circulation. 2000;101:1940–1946.
A.Kulik, I.G.Burwash, V.Kapila, et al. Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis:impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 2006;114:I5553–I5558.
M.Briand, J.G.Dumesnil, L.Kadem, et al. Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis:implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:291–298.
H.Baumgartner, T.Steffenelli, J.Niederberger, et al. “Overestimation” of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis:a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1655–1661.
S.Marechaux, P.V.Ennezat, T.H.LeJemtel, et al. Left ventricular response to exercise in aortic stenosis:an exercise echocardiographic study. Echocardiography. 2007;24:955–959.
P.Lancellotti, J.Magne, E.Donal, et al. Determinants and prognostic significance of exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2012;126:851–859.
M.R.Dweck, C.Jones, N.V.Joshi, et al. Assessment of valvular calcification and inflammation by positron emission tomography in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2012;125:76–86.
P.Pibarot, J.G.Dumesnil. Improving assessment of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:169–180.
E.Altiok, R.Koos, J.Schroder, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart. 2011;97:1578–1584.
M.Garbi, J.Chambers, M.A.Vannan, et al. Valve stress echocardiography:a practical guide for referral, procedure, reporting, and clinical implementation of results from the HAVEC group. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:724–736.
P.Das, H.Rimington, J.Chambers. Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1309–1313.
E.Donal, C.Thebault, K.O’Connor, et al. Impact of aortic stenosis on longitudinal myocardial deformation during exercise. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:235–241.
P.Lancellotti, F.Lebois, M.Simon, et al. Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2005;112:I377–I382.
S.Marechaux, Z.Hachicha, A.Bellouin, et al. Usefulness of exercise-stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1390–1397.
D.Messika-Zeitoun, J.M.Serfaty, E.Brochet, et al. Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter:implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:186–194.
H.Jilaihawi, N.Doctor, M.Kashif, et al. Aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement using cross-sectional 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:908–916.
G.Feuchtner, F.Plank, T.Bartel, et al. Prediction of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography:value of aortic valve and annular calcification. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1574–1580.
M.Marwan, S.Achenbach, S.M.Ensminger, et al. CT predictors of post-procedural aortic regurgitation in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation:an analysis of 105 patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29:1191–1198.
M.A.Clavel, D.Messika-Zeitoun, P.Pibarot, et al. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading:new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2329–2338.•• This is the first study that emphasized the role of MDCT, through the computation of aortic valve calcium score, as a flow independent method to assess AS severity and tried to propose cut-off values that could be applied in clinical practice, pointing out sex differences.
S.R.Aggarwal, M.A.Clavel, D.Messika-Zeitoun, et al. Sex differences in aortic valve calcification measured by multidetector computed tomography in aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:40–47.
C.W.Chin, H.J.Khaw, E.Luo, et al. Echocardiography underestimates stroke volume and aortic valve area:implications for patients with small-area low-gradient aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1064–1072.
M.Habis, B.Daoud, V.L.Roger, et al. Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planimetry and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2007;16:216–224.
A.C.Eichenberger, R.Jenni, G.K.von Schulthess. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis:quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:971–977.
M.R.Dweck, S.Joshi, T.Murigu, et al. Midwall fibrosis is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1271–1279.•• This is the first study to show that LV mid wall fibrosis as assessed by late gadolinium enhancement CMR was an independent predictor of mortality in patients with AS.
G.Barone-Rochette, S.Pierard, D.R.De Meester, et al. Prognostic significance of LGE by CMR in aortic stenosis patients undergoing valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:144–154.
A.S.Flett, M.P.Hayward, M.T.Ashworth, et al. Equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the measurement of diffuse myocardial fibrosis:preliminary validation in humans. Circulation. 2010;122:138–144.
F.Le Ven, H.Tizon-Marcos, C.Fuchs, et al. Valve tissue characterization by magnetic resonance imaging in calcific aortic valve disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1676–1683.
T.Derlin, Z.Toth, L.Papp, et al. Correlation of inflammation assessed by 18F-FDG PET, active mineral deposition assessed by 18F-fluoride PET, and vascular calcification in atherosclerotic plaque:a dual-tracer PET/CT study. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1020–1027.
N.M.Rajamannan, F.J.Evans, E.Aikawa, et al. Calcific aortic valve disease:not simply a degenerative process:A review and agenda for research from the national heart and lung and blood institute aortic stenosis working group. Executive summary:calcific aortic valve disease-2011 update. Circulation. 2011;124:1783–1791.
C.Blais, I.G.Burwash, G.Mundigler, et al. The projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low flow aortic stenosis:the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation. 2006;113:711–721.
M.A.Clavel, I.G.Burwash, G.Mundigler, et al. Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis:the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:380–386.
R.Rosenhek, T.Binder, G.Porenta, et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:611–617.
C.M.Otto, I.G.Burwash, M.E.Legget, et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation. 1997;95:2262–2270.
R.Rosenhek, R.Zilberszac, M.Schemper, et al. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121:151–156.
P.Lancellotti, M.Moonen, J.Magne, et al. Prognostic effect of long-axis left ventricular dysfunction and B-type natriuretic peptide levels in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:383–388.
G.Cioffi, P.Faggiano, E.Vizzardi, et al. Prognostic effect of inappropriately high left ventricular mass in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2011;97:301–307.
P.Lancellotti, E.Donal, J.Magne, et al. Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis:the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay. Heart. 2010;96:1364–1371.
J.L.Monin, J.P.Quere, M.Monchi, et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis:operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome:a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation. 2003;108:319–324.•• This study showed that increased aortic valve calcium score, as assessed by MDCT, independently predicted excess mortality in patients with severe AS. Hence, it should be considered not only for diagnosis but also for risk stratification.
M.A.Clavel, P.Pibarot, D.Messika-Zeitoun, et al. Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis:results of an international registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1202–1213.
A.S.Flett, D.M.Sado, G.Quarta, et al. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis:an equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:819–826.
M.R.Dweck, W.S.Jenkins, A.T.Vesey, et al. 18F-sodium fluoride uptake is a marker of active calcification and disease progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:371–378.•• This was the first study to show that PET with the evaluation of 18F-NaF uptake by the aortic leaflets might identify active tissue calcification and predict disease progression in patients with calcific AS.
K.L.Chan, K.Teo, J.G.Dumesnil, et al. Effect of Lipid lowering with rosuvastatin on progression of aortic stenosis:results of the aortic stenosis progression observation:measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) trial. Circulation. 2010;121:306–314.
S.J.Cowell, D.E.Newby, R.J.Prescott, et al. A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2389–2397.
A.B.Rossebo, T.R.Pedersen, K.Boman, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1343–1356.
R.Rosenhek, G.Maurer, H.Baumgartner. Should early elective surgery be performed in patients with severe but asymptomatic aortic stenosis? Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1417.
B.Iung, G.Baron, E.G.Butchart, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe:the euro heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–1243.
C.Tribouilloy, F.Grigioni, J.F.Avierinos, et al. Survival implication of left ventricular end-systolic diameter in mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflets a long-term follow-up multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1961–1968.
J.Bergler-Klein, G.Mundigler, P.Pibarot, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis:relationship to hemodynamics and clinical outcome. Circulation. 2007;115:2848–2855.
R.A.Nishimura, J.A.Grantham, H.M.Connolly, et al. Low-output, low-gradient aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular systolic function:the clinical utility of the dobutamine challenge in the catheterization laboratory. Circulation. 2002;106:809–813.
E.Fougeres, C.Tribouilloy, M.Monchi, et al. Outcomes of pseudo-severe aortic stenosis under conservative treatment. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2426–2433.
C.Tribouilloy, F.Levy, D.Rusinaru, et al. Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1865–1873.
J.P.Quere, J.L.Monin, F.Levy, et al. Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006;113:1738–1744.
C.Cueff, J.M.Serfaty, C.Cimadevilla, et al. Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography:correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction. Heart. 2011;97:721–726.
F.Weidemann, S.Herrmann, S.Stork, et al. Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:577–584.
M.Gotzmann, P.Rahlmann, T.Hehnen, et al. Heart failure in severe aortic valve stenosis:prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction and mean gradient on outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14:1155–1162.
D.Cramariuc, G.Cioffi, A.E.Rieck, et al. Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients:valvular-arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS Substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:390–399.
P.Pibarot, J.G.Dumesnil. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1845–1853.
M.F.Eleid, R.A.Nishimura, P.Sorajja, et al. Systemic hypertension in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2013;128:1349–1353.
M.A.Clavel, M.Berthelot-Richer, F.Le Ven, et al. Impact of classic and paradoxical low flow on survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:645–653.
Clavel MA, Dumesnil JG, Capoulade R, et al. Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(14):1259–1267.
C.Tribouilloy, D.Rusinaru, S.Marechaux, et al. Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction:characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:55–66.
C.W.Chin, D.Messika-Zeitoun, A.S.Shah, et al. A clinical risk score of myocardial fibrosis predicts adverse outcomes in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:713–723.